Encuesta: El rol del verde residencial durante el confinamiento por el brote de COVID-19 en España

El grupo de investigación BCNUEJ (www.bcnuej.org) del ICTA-UAB (https://ictaweb.uab.cat/) y del IMIM (www.imim.es) está realizando un estudio sobre el papel del verde residencial (vegetación interior, en balcones, en terrazas, cubiertas verdes, jardines particulares, etc.

ICTA-UAB shares protective material with hospitals

ICTA-UAB is since last Monday 16 March 2020, an Institute with Restricted Access. Most of the laboratories are empty, the Scientific and Technical Services are closed, only the basic services are working and most of the people is working and staying at home.

Higher and earlier pollen concentrations expected for this spring

Spring and summer pollination will begin a few days earlier than usual and in important numbers, reaching higher than average levels (from the 1994-2019 period).

ICTAS2020 Conference: Important Update regarding the Coronavirus Outbreak

ICTAS2020 Conference: Important Update regarding the Coronavirus Outbreak .

Power struggles hinder urban adaptation policies to climate change

Transformative actions implemented by cities to address and mitigate the impacts of climate change may be hindered by political struggles for municipal power.

Analysis of tropical fire soot deposited in the ocean will help predict future global climate changes

The ICTA-UAB begins a scientific expedition in the Atlantic Ocean to collect dust and smoke samples from the fires of tropical Africa deposited in marine sediments.

What elements and characteristics should forests have to influence human health?

Despite the increasing interest of the scientific community and society towards the potential of forests as a source of human health, the existing scientific literature does not allow for a coherent relationship between the type of forest and different health variables.

Red coral effectively recovers in Mediterranean protected areas after decades of overexploitation

Protection measures of the Marine Protected Areas have enable red coral colonies (Corallium rubrum) to recover partially in the Mediterranean Sea, reaching health levels similar to those of the 1980s in Catalonia and of the 1960s in the Ligurian Sea (Northwestern Italy).

Sub-national “climate clubs” could offer key to combating climate change

‘Climate clubs’ offering membership for sub-national states, in addition to just countries, could speed up progress towards a globally-harmonised climate change policy, which in turn offers a way to achieve stronger climate policies in all countries.

Victoria Reyes-García receives an ERC Proof of Concept grant linked to the LICCI project

Victoria Reyes-García ICREA Research Professor at the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ICTA-UAB) is one of the 76 top researchers that will receive ERC Proof of Concept grants.

ICTA-UAB demands the UAB to reduce number of flights

Given our current climate emergency, recently acknowledged by the UAB, the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ICTA-UAB) has drawn up a proposal urging the University to put into action a new travel policy to tackle one of its most polluting activities: Flying.

New assessment finds EU electricity decarbonization discourse in need of overhaul

It’s well known that the EU is focusing its efforts on decarbonizing its economy.

Mining waste dumped into Portmán Bay continues to release metals into the sea 25 years later

The waters of the Mediterranean Sea continue to receive dissolved metals from the mining waste deposited in Portmán Bay (Murcia) 25 years after the cessation of mining activity.

A new ICTA-UAB project to assess the impacts of micro- and nano-plastics in the tropical and temperate oceans

A new project led by ICTA-UAB researcher Patrizia Ziveri is one of five projects selected for funding by the Joint Programming Initiative Healthy and Productive Seas and Oceans (JPI Oceans).

Big data reveals extraordinary unity underlying life’s diversity

Limits to growth lie at the heart of how all living things function, according to a new study carried out by ICTA-UAB researchers  .
Cities, pollution and climate change: to what extent can green infrastructure help?

Date: 2018-10-26

Cities, pollution and climate change: to what extent can green infrastructure help?

"la Caixa” Social Observatory Award for the best article in the field of Science

By Francesc Baró, postdoctoral researcher at ICTA-UAB
This review was originally published at la Caixa” Social Observatory”

The available evidence indicates that urban green infrastructure (urban parks, street trees, green roofs and walls, etc.) can make a modest contribution to remedying carbon emissions, reducing heat stress and lowering atmospheric pollution in cities. If we wish to solve these problems, we need to take action on pollution sources because compensatory measures based on nature are far from sufficient. Urban green infrastructure strategies can play a role by complementing, but not replacing, pollution reduction strategies.

Key points

  1. Urban policies on mitigating climate change and atmospheric pollution need to focus primarily on pollution sources (traffic, transport systems, heating, etc.) rather than the so-called ‘sinks’ (solutions in the form of reservoirs capable of absorbing or countering contaminants but which have a very limited capacity).
  2. Urban parks, street trees and plants on buildings can act as areas and corridors of clean, cool air in cities and are particularly important due to the lack of available land in urban population centres. Most of these elements serve multiple functions for the three ‘ecosystem’ services in question: air quality, local temperature and carbon sequestering.
  3. To improve human health in cities it is essential to improve air quality and thermal comfort, aspects on which urban green infrastructure can provide good support at a local level.

  4. With regard to the mitigation of and adaptation to climate change, local and metropolitan authorities need to foster carbon offsetting beyond their urban boundaries, as this is a challenge on a global scale. Green infrastructure can be employed to impact on transport systems and pollution sources (power stations, large industrial companies, etc.) that are located at a distance from urban population centres.

Ability of urban green infrastructure to mitigate problems associated with pollution




In urban areas, priority is usually given to infrastructure that contributes to improving the quality of the environment and the health and wellbeing of the urban population. This infrastructure is focused, for example, on air purification, noise abatement and urban temperature control. However, the extent to which green infrastructure can provide these ‘ecosystem’ services effectively depends on numerous structural, functional and environmental conditions.

1. Introduction

Global urbanisation is now a relentless phenomenon, meaning that increasing numbers of cities are having to face up to multiple climate change-related challenges. These challenges materialize in the form of problems such as heat stress and air pollution, and most importantly, in serious consequences for the health of city inhabitants. In response, a growing number of policy-makers, technical experts and scientists are claiming that greener cities are also more sustainable, more liveable, healthier and safer. Thus, urban green spaces (e.g. city parks, street trees, green roofs and walls, etc.) are increasingly being considered, planned and managed as a “green infrastructure” with the ultimate aim of ensuring people’s wellbeing and health. However, the matter of how far urban green infrastructure can really address these challenges is rarely assessed, which means that political decision-makers lack solid information on which to base policies.

Our increasingly urban planet faces multiple climate change-related challenges, including heat stress and air pollution, often with dramatic health impacts on the urban population.

This article concludes that the contribution of this green infrastructure is often uncertain or less than expected, especially when considering an entire city or metropolitan area. It summarises the results of various scientific assessments undertaken in Barcelona and other European cities, aimed at determining to what extent urban green infrastructure helps compensate carbon emissions, reduce heat stress and reduce air pollution in the city. The results indicate that, although it is true that recognizing green spaces as a key urban infrastructure may support municipal initiatives, it is also important to take into account and investigate in depth the limitations involved.

2. Greener cities to tackle the challenges of climate change?

Our planet is increasingly urbanised: over half of the world’s population now lives in cities. By 2050 that fraction will have increased to 66% according to United Nations (UN) forecasts, adding 2.5 billion people to the world’s urban inhabitants (UN, 2015). However, the majority of cities and metropolitan areas are facing multiple challenges caused or exacerbated by climate change, such as heat stress, inland and coastal flooding, droughts, increased aridity and air pollution, often with dramatic consequences for the health of their urban populations (Revi et al., 2014).

Thus, for example, the World Health Organization estimates that ambient air pollution caused the premature death of 3.7 million people worldwide in 2012. So making cities and human settlements more resilient, sustainable, liveable and safe should be a fundamental priority on every local government’s agenda, as reflected in the eleventh UN Sustainable Development Goal.

Within this context, there are growing numbers of policy-makers, technical experts and scientists who consider that priority must be given to planning and managing urban and periurban green spaces (city parks and gardens, street trees, green roofs and walls, periurban forests, etc.) as a cost-effective infrastructure to cope with this growing number of climate threats. The European Union describes the concept of green infrastructure as “a strategically planned network of natural and semi-natural areas with other environmental features, designed and managed to deliver a wide range of ecosystem services” (EC, 2013).

In turn, these “ecosystem services” are generally defined as “the direct and indirect contributions of ecosystems to human wellbeing and health” (TEEB, 2011) and hence they enable nature-society interactions to be examined in depth.

Urban green infrastructure contributes to better human health and wellbeing in cities through the provision of ecosystem services, but its potential impact remains largely unknown by local decision-makers.

In urban areas, the ecosystem services usually given priority are those that contribute to improving environmental quality and the wellbeing and health of the urban population (figure 1). They are oriented, for example, towards air purification, noise reduction, urban temperature regulation or mitigation of runoff (excess rainwater or water from other sources running over non-absorbent surfaces). However, how far urban green infrastructure can provide these ecosystem services effectively depends on multiple structural, functional and environmental conditions. Thus, for example, urban vegetation can reduce local temperatures (by providing shade and transporting water from the soil to the air), hence mitigating heatwave risks for human health. Obviously, urban trees play a much more prominent role in both processes than other types of vegetation such as shrubs or grass.

However, the true scope of these green interventions is unknown to local authorities and other urban stakeholders, since its real or potential contribution is often overlooked in evaluations of this type. This article helps bridge this knowledge gap and assess the potential of green infrastructure to cope with different urban challenges related with climate change across five European cities. The research focuses on air pollution abatement, climate change mitigation and heat stress reduction, with a spotlight on Barcelona.


3. Green infrastructure impacts across five european cities

This research encompasses an original cross-analysis of five European cities: Rotterdam, Berlin, Salzburg, Stockholm and Barcelona. Indicators on air purification, carbon sequestration (capacity for removal of CO2 from the atmosphere) and urban temperature regulation were estimated, based on mathematical models produced via widely applied tools. The services that underwent evaluation contribute to tackling various urban challenges such as improvement in air quality, climate change mitigation and reduction of the heat stress suffered by cities. Air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, indicators that measure the “environmental pressure” being placed on cities, were also estimated in order to assess the relative benefits of green infrastructure.

The research results indicate that average air quality improvements due to air purification provision by green infrastructure are relatively low at the municipal scale for the three air pollutants analysed in all the cities in the study: particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide and greenhouse gases (table 1).



Therefore, the average green infrastructure contribution towards compliance with air quality standards is considered modest at city-wide level in all the cases analysed. This suggests that increasing these infrastructures (for example, through tree-planting programmes) has only limited effectiveness against air pollution problems, unless levels are moderate at the outse

Similarly, the contribution of green infrastructure to carbon sequestration (to offset city greenhouse emissions) is somewhat weak. Of the total greenhouse gases emitted in Rotterdam (representing the worst case), 0.12% were neutralised thanks to these infrastructures. In the best of cases (Salzburg), the percentage reaches only 2.75%. These results also reveal that the contribution to greenhouse gas reduction targets in each case-study city is very modest (less than 15%: in the best of cases, Salzburg, it reaches 13.77%).

Finally, this assessment and other empirical studies (Bowler et al., 2010) make it clear that vegetation may be somewhat relevant in regulating urban temperature and mitigating heat stress at the local site scale; however, its impact at the wider city scale is uncertain.

4. The case of Barcelona: a closer look

Barcelona’s urban area is a complex socioecological system that makes an excellent testing ground for the purposes of this research and one where local and regional authorities are evaluating the strategic possibility of implementing the green infrastructure approach (for example, with the Barcelona Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Plan 2020). Firstly, because Barcelona is one of Europe’s most densely populated urban areas (especially at the city scale, which poses great pressures and challenges in relation to urban green infrastructure policies) and secondly, because the city still contains a rich variety of natural and agricultural habitats of great relevance in terms of ecosystem services provision at the metropolitan level.

To complement the analysis carried out in the city of Barcelona, an assessment was conducted at the scale of the Barcelona metropolitan area, which encompasses 164 municipalities across seven counties. Here, several ecosystem services indicators were estimated using tools that include models developed to support environmental policies on a European scale (Zulian et al., 2018). As would be expected, the highest levels of pollutants and carbon appeared basically in the municipality of Barcelona and the adjacent middle-sized cities (figures 2b and 3b).  The carbon-offsetting impact of urban green infrastructure is small on average (less than 5% of the total of emissions are absorbed) across the Barcelona metropolitan region (figure 3c). In only five out of 164 municipalities are the estimated carbon emissions completely offset by carbon sequestration from local ecosystems. However, these municipalities are characterized by a very low population (fewer than 500 inhabitants) and a predominance of forest land cover.

The research results indicate that the potential of urban green infrastructure to counteract carbon emissions, air pollution and heat stress is often limited or uncertain, especially on the metropolitan and city scales.

Air purification (measured through NO2 removal) and global climate regulation (measured through carbon sequestration) when transposed onto the map of Barcelona’s metropolitan region, show similar spatial distribution patterns (figures 2a and 3a). The impact of these ecosystem services is especially significant in forest areas on the city outskirts, such as the Collserola mountain range and other natural areas located further inland in the region. However, effective NO2 removal in some of these areas (e.g., the Montseny massif) is relatively low because they are not adjacent to the main cities and so cannot contribute towards offsetting their emissions (figure 2b). In urban and agricultural land, the provision capacity of ecosystem services is the lowest of those studied.

As observed in the local scale assessment, Barcelona’s urban core is characterized by a compact form, a very high population density and a relatively small share of inner green areas, which explains these results. The other middle-sized municipalities, located both along the coastline and in the interior, suffer, in the majority of cases, lower environmental pressure.

The NO2 concentration map also reveals that high-capacity roads (motorways and dual carriageways) are major sources of NO2 pollution. The resulting map (figure 2b) shows places where ecosystem service provision cannot sustain a good air quality level in line with the NO2 annual limit value of 40 micrograms per cubic metre, as set by the EU Air Quality Directive.


The carbon-offsetting impact of urban green infrastructure is small on average (less than 5% of the total of emissions are absorbed) across the Barcelona metropolitan region (figure 3c). In only five out of 164 municipalities are the estimated carbon emissions completely offset by carbon sequestration from local ecosystems. However, these municipalities are characterized by a very low population (fewer than 500 inhabitants) and a predominance of forest land cover.



5. Conclusions and implications for urban policies

Urban green infrastructure’s potential for offsetting carbon emissions, air pollution and heat stress is often limited and/or uncertain, especially in compact cities such as Barcelona. This suggests that, as a general rule, the magnitude of these environmental problems is too high at the city scale as compared to the real or potential contribution of urban ecosystem services in mitigating their impacts.

On the metropolitan scale, the proportion of urban green infrastructure versus built-up or urbanized land is generally substantially higher than at the core city level. However, ecosystem services assessments on this scale also show marginal impacts on the overall carbon balance, i.e. on the ratio between carbon sequestration and carbon emissions (in the case of Barcelona, less than 1% of emissions are sequestered). Furthermore, the high capacity for contributing to a potential improvement in air quality and a reduction in heat stress, estimated in large areas of metropolitan green infrastructures (such as protected natural spaces) generally does not materialize. This is due to their distance from demand sites, such as residential areas most affected by air pollution or the urban heat island effect.

This result indicates that the relevant scale data for applying these strategies is probably limited to city level or even smaller scales. In fact, results from other studies largely corroborate the fact that urban green infrastructure, especially urban trees, can improve air quality, offset carbon emissions and reduce heat stress at the site level (especially within and around green spaces). However, several factors, such as species selection and management practices, can have a critical impact on the performance of urban ecosystem services.

Table 2 summarizes, on three different scales (metropolitan, city and site), the scientific evidence associated with the potential of the three regulating ecosystem services considered in this article as nature-based solutions. The latter scale is divided into two categories (green space and street) as these are generally the two most relevant urban sites in terms of green infrastructure.

Based on these results, the following urban policy and research implications can be drawn:

Air pollution problems and local targets for the reduction of greenhouse gases should be tackled through emission reduction policies such as road traffic management or energy efficiency measures. In other words, urban policies on air pollution and climate change mitigation should focus primarily on contamination sources (built infrastructure and transport systems) rather than on so-called “sinks” (urban vegetation that absorbs carbon and pollutants). Green infrastructure strategies play a complementary, not alternative role to these policies. Additionally, carbon offsets associated with green infrastructure should be fostered by local and metropolitan authorities beyond urban boundaries because the scale of the challenge is global.

Urban green infrastructure can contribute to site-scale strategies to improve air quality and thermal comfort, and hence human health. Thus, for example, urban parks, street trees or green roofs or walls (vegetation on buildings) can act as clean air or cool areas and corridors within cities. The potential of green roofs, green walls and street trees is particularly relevant due to the lack of available land in urban cores.

The benefits and limitations related to urban green infrastructure should be considered in planning and management in order to estimate net contributions to environmental quality. Even if most urban green infrastructure elements are multi-functional in relation to the three ecosystem services considered in this analysis, some potential problems have been also identified. Thus, for example, street trees provide a high shading effect, but they are also associated with a potential “barrier effect” by which they prevent the dispersion of pollutants into the air.

Recognizing green spaces as key urban infrastructures may contribute to supporting municipal initiatives on air pollution and climate change mitigation and adaptation, but any associated limitations and potentially unwanted effects must also be considered and further investigated.

Although the scope of this analysis is limited to three regulating ecosystem services (air quality, local climate and carbon sequestration), the urban green infrastructure can obviously also provide additional services and benefits. These include runoff control and subsequent opportunities for recreational activities (Demuzere et al., 2014). Unlike traditional urban infrastructures (such as road infrastructure) normally designed as single-purpose, the added value of urban green infrastructure resides in its multi-functionality. 

Therefore, planning and managing urban green infrastructure within the context of its contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation requires a holistic approach. Planners and policy-makers must take into consideration the whole range of ecosystem services provided by different types of urban green infrastructure and the interactions between them, together with the different spatial scales at which these ecosystem services can be significant. This approach calls for strong multi-scale institutional coordination between all the authorities dealing with urban and environmental policies and for the harmonization of planning and management instruments across different sectors.

ICTA's Activities